SFT-4382: Bump docker/build-push-action.
What changed, and why it matters
This commit simply updates a GitHub Actions helper used to build Docker images from version 5 to version 6. There is no indication of a security fix or vulnerability in the change itself.
No security action required. Treat as routine CI maintenance. If desired, review the docker/build-push-action v6 release notes for any breaking changes or new security-related options, but the commit itself does not introduce or fix a security issue.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The patch bumps docker/build-push-action from v5 to v6 in four workflow jobs within .github/workflows/build.yaml. No other workflow logic, inputs, secrets handling, or build commands were modified. This is a routine dependency/maintenance update of a third-party GitHub Action.
Changed components
.github/workflows/build.yamlInspect captured patch +4 / −4
diff --git a/.github/workflows/build.yaml b/.github/workflows/build.yaml
index 005a820..7954b5b 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/build.yaml
+++ b/.github/workflows/build.yaml
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ jobs:
- uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
with:
driver-opts: network=host
- - uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
+ - uses: docker/build-push-action@v6
with:
push: true
context: .
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ jobs:
- uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
with:
driver-opts: network=host
- - uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
+ - uses: docker/build-push-action@v6
with:
push: true
context: .
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ jobs:
- uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
with:
driver-opts: network=host
- - uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
+ - uses: docker/build-push-action@v6
with:
push: true
context: .
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ jobs:
- uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
with:
driver-opts: network=host
- - uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
+ - uses: docker/build-push-action@v6
with:
push: true
context: .
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.