AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Bitcoin

Merge pull request #660 from Foundation-Devices/fix/legacy-settings-overflow

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Jacksper13

78/100 · Adequate
Merge pull request #660 from Foundation-Devices/fix/legacy-settings-overflow

Validate legacy settings before flash writes
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bug in how the Passport hardware wallet saves its settings to internal flash memory. Previously, the code checked whether the settings data was too large only after it had already picked and erased a flash storage slot. If the data was too big, the code hit a broken 'assert false' statement that would crash the device. The fix moves the size check earlier, before any flash slot is touched, and replaces the crash with a proper error. A new unit test confirms that oversized settings are rejected before any flash operation happens.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-to-moderate reliability and potential security fix. Review whether any user-facing path can produce settings near DATA_SIZE, and ensure the new ValueError is handled gracefully by callers rather than leaving settings unsaved. Consider backporting to firmware branches that still use the old assert-false ordering.

Security signals we found

01

Buffer size validation moved before flash write/erase operations

02

Replaced broken 'assert false' crash path with explicit ValueError

03

Added unit test for oversized settings rejection

04

Potential flash corruption / wear due to erase-before-validation

05

Device availability impact from unhandled assertion/crash on oversized settings

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.