fuzz-tests: Add coverage-increasing inputs to seed corpora
What changed, and why it matters
This commit only adds two new test input files to a fuzz-testing seed corpus. Fuzzing seed corpora are collections of example inputs used to automatically exercise code during testing. The change does not modify any production code, configuration, or cryptographic logic. There is no indication of a security vulnerability being fixed or introduced.
No security action required. Treat as routine test-asset maintenance.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit adds two binary/seed inputs under tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/. One file contains a repeated ‘Q’ string ending with a hyphen; the other is a binary blob. The commit message states these inputs increase code coverage for the fuzz-hsm_secret fuzz target. No source code is changed, no bug is described, and no patch to runtime behavior is present.
Changed components
tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/23310b00d98159b5b169b2b919f4af986233e4a0tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/25172a8f2d48f9081b884ed5066cb4fc41a7099dInspect captured patch +1 / −0
diff --git a/tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/23310b00d98159b5b169b2b919f4af986233e4a0 b/tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/23310b00d98159b5b169b2b919f4af986233e4a0
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..46621581
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/23310b00d98159b5b169b2b919f4af986233e4a0
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ-
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/25172a8f2d48f9081b884ed5066cb4fc41a7099d b/tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/25172a8f2d48f9081b884ed5066cb4fc41a7099d
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..af96d3a4
Binary files /dev/null and b/tests/fuzz/corpora/fuzz-hsm_secret/25172a8f2d48f9081b884ed5066cb4fc41a7099d differ
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.