AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 43 Bitcoin

lightningd: fix db constraint error when fixing up old blocks.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Rusty Russell

85/100 · Strong
lightningd: fix db constraint error when fixing up old blocks.

It's very hard to reproduce, since we only consider UTXOs we are watching, but scanning
from the first block we know about is wrong, because we don't care about blocks which
we only put in the db in response to old gossip queries.

I'm not sure how Sjors got into the state where they see their own UTXO spend in a block
they don't have in the database, but we shouldn't crash:

```
2025-12-07T11:25:18.163Z **BROKEN** lightningd: Error executing statement: wallet/wallet.c:4913: UPDATE outputs SET spend_height = ?, status = ? WHERE prev_out_tx = ? AND prev_out_index = ?: FOREIGN KEY constraint failed
2025-12-07T11:25:18.163Z **BROKEN** lightningd: Error executing statement: wallet/wallet.c:4913: UPDATE outputs SET spend_height = ?, status = ? WHERE prev_out_tx = ? AND prev_out_index = ?: FOREIGN KEY constraint failed
2025-12-07T11:25:18.179Z **BROKEN** lightningd: FATAL SIGNAL 6 (version v25.12)
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: common/daemon.c:46 (send_backtrace) 0x5e263feb9292
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: common/daemon.c:83 (crashdump) 0x5e263feb92e1
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: (null):0 ((null)) 0x70ee6f64532f
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: (null):0 ((null)) 0x70ee6f69eb2c
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: (null):0 ((null)) 0x70ee6f64527d
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: (null):0 ((null)) 0x70ee6f6288fe
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/log.c:1054 (fatal_vfmt) 0x5e263fe38e10
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: wallet/db.c:95 (db_error) 0x5e263fe6f7ef
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: db/utils.c:326 (db_fatal) 0x5e263feaa797
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: db/utils.c:200 (db_exec_prepared_v2) 0x5e263feaab85
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: wallet/wallet.c:4924 (wallet_outpoint_spend) 0x5e263fe7de2f
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/chaintopology.c:929 (topo_update_spends) 0x5e263fe0af81
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/chaintopology.c:1532 (fixup_scan_block) 0x5e263fe0c268
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/bitcoind.c:503 (getrawblockbyheight_callback) 0x5e263fe09280
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/plugin.c:701 (plugin_response_handle) 0x5e263fe5bf2b
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/plugin.c:790 (plugin_read_json) 0x5e263fe610e7
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: ccan/ccan/io/io.c:60 (next_plan) 0x5e263fef3629
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: ccan/ccan/io/io.c:422 (do_plan) 0x5e263fef3afa
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: ccan/ccan/io/io.c:439 (io_ready) 0x5e263fef3bb7
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: ccan/ccan/io/poll.c:470 (io_loop) 0x5e263fef55c5
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/io_loop_with_timers.c:22 (io_loop_with_timers) 0x5e263fe308e9
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/lightningd.c:1492 (main) 0x5e263fe363ce
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: (null):0 ((null)) 0x70ee6f62a1c9
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: (null):0 ((null)) 0x70ee6f62a28a
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: (null):0 ((null)) 0x5e263fe06bf4
2025-12-07T11:25:18.180Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: (null):0 ((null)) 0xffffffffffffffff
```

Changelog-Fixes: lightningd: crash on fixup scan with old blocks.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a crash in Core Lightning (a Bitcoin Lightning Network node implementation) that could occur during a one-time database repair scan. The node would start scanning from the oldest block it had ever stored, including blocks saved only for old network gossip queries. If one of those early blocks contained a spend of the node's own funds, the code tried to update a database record referencing a block height that did not exist in the main chain-tracking table, triggering a foreign-key constraint failure and crashing the daemon with SIGABRT. The fix makes the scan start from the oldest contiguous block in the main chain record instead, skipping the gossip-only backfilled blocks.

Recommended action

Upgrade to a Core Lightning release containing this commit. The issue is a denial-of-service (node crash) during normal startup repair, not a funds-loss bug, but it can make a node unavailable. Operators seeing the FOREIGN KEY crash on startup should upgrade rather than attempt manual database edits.

Security signals we found

01

Daemon abort/crash (SIGABRT via fatal_vfmt/db_error)

02

SQL FOREIGN KEY constraint failure in wallet_outpoint_spend

03

Crash triggered by on-chain spend of wallet-owned UTXO during startup repair scan

04

Fixup scan boundary derived from sparse block table including gossip backfill

05

Availability impact: node terminates unexpectedly

Risk score

Why this scored 43/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.