AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 16 Bitcoin

lsp_plugin: remove feature flag temporarily to ...

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Peter Neuroth

95/100 · Strong
lsp_plugin: remove feature flag temporarily to ...

please `connect` tests. We need to fix this in the future. Connectd
should not tell peers about features of disabled plugins.
We need to ensure that connectd only starts once the plugins have
returned from init.

Signed-off-by: Peter Neuroth <pet.v.ne@gmail.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit temporarily stops an experimental Lightning Service Provider (LSP) plugin from advertising a specific protocol feature to other nodes. The change is described by the developer as a short-term workaround to make automated tests pass, not as a security fix. It removes the public announcement of a feature bit while leaving the rest of the plugin's code in place, with a note that the underlying startup-order problem should be fixed later.

Recommended action

No immediate security action required. Treat as normal development cleanup. If tracking technical debt, monitor the referenced FIXME about connectd startup ordering and plugin feature advertisement.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant language in commit title or message

02

Change is framed as test-fixing workaround, not as a vulnerability patch

03

Feature bit is optional per LSPS specification, so disabling it is protocol-compliant

04

No input validation, cryptography, authorization, or memory-safety changes

05

FIXME comment indicates known technical debt, not a security defect

Risk score

Why this scored 16/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.