AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 29 Bitcoin

splice: Update splice_info tlv to use odd version

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Dusty Daemon

80/100 · Strong
splice: Update splice_info tlv to use odd version

Update the tlv to use the type referenced in the spec, which also makes marks the tlv as optional.

Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: --experimental-splicing: if you have splicing enabled on a channel both nodes must upgrade in unison due to updating commitment_signeds splice_info tlv's type.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes an experimental splicing feature's internal message numbering from 0 to 1 so it matches the official Lightning spec and becomes optional. It is a compatibility/standards-alignment fix, not a direct security patch. Both channel peers must upgrade together or they may fail to understand each other's splice-related messages.

Recommended action

Treat as a standards-compliance/interoperability update rather than a security fix. Nodes using `--experimental-splicing` should upgrade both peers together to avoid splice negotiation failures. No urgent security deployment is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

Protocol message type renumbering to align with draft specification

02

TLV type changed from even (required) to odd (optional)

03

Experimental feature requiring coordinated upgrade

04

No memory-safety, cryptographic, or authorization changes visible

Risk score

Why this scored 29/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.