updated pull request for next cln release timeline
What changed, and why it matters
This commit only updates the GitHub pull request template with new release timeline dates and adds a checklist reminder about reversing persistent changes for a downgrade tool. It does not change any code, build scripts, or security-sensitive configuration.
No security action required; this is a routine project-management documentation update.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff modifies .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: release freeze/RC1/final dates are shifted from the 25.12 cycle to the 26.04 cycle, and a new checklist item is added reminding contributors to consider reversibility of persistent changes for tools/lightning-downgrade. No source code, tests, CI workflows, or cryptographic material is touched.
Changed components
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdInspect captured patch +4 / −3
diff --git a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
index f33ae33d..df596985 100644
--- a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
+++ b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
> [!IMPORTANT]
>
-> 25.12 FREEZE October 27th: Non-bugfix PRs not ready by this date will wait for 26.03.
+> 26.04 FREEZE March 11th: Non-bugfix PRs not ready by this date will wait for 26.06.
>
-> RC1 is scheduled on _November 10th_
+> RC1 is scheduled on _March 23rd_
>
-> The final release is scheduled for December 1st.
+> The final release is scheduled for April 15th.
## Checklist
@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ Before submitting the PR, ensure the following tasks are completed. If an item i
- [ ] Tests have been added or modified to reflect the changes.
- [ ] Documentation has been reviewed and updated as needed.
- [ ] Related issues have been listed and linked, including any that this PR closes.
+- [ ] *Important* All PRs must consider how to reverse any persistent changes for `tools/lightning-downgrade`
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.