AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

pytest: fix flake in test_gossip_query_channel_range

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Rusty Russell

83/100 · Strong
pytest: fix flake in test_gossip_query_channel_range

If l4 sends a WIRE_QUERY_SHORT_CHANNEL_IDS at the wrong time, we will
get that and be upset the response is wrong:

```
2026-01-13T14:45:55.9059786Z E AssertionError: assert ['010806226e46111a0b59caaf126043eb5bbf28c34f3a5e332a1fc7b2b73cf188910f00000000000f42400100110000006800000100000000690000010000', '010506226e46111a0b59caaf126043eb5bbf28c34f3a5e332a1fc7b2b73cf188910f001100000068000001000000006900000100000103000402'] in (['010806226e46111a0b59caaf126043eb5bbf28c34f3a5e332a1fc7b2b73cf188910f00000000000f42400100110000006800000100000000690000010000'], ['010806226e46111a0b59caaf126043eb5bbf28c34f3a5e332a1fc7b2b73cf188910f00000000000f42400100110000006900000100000000680000010000'])
2026-01-13T14:45:55.9063357Z
2026-01-13T14:45:55.9063527Z tests/test_gossip.py:762: AssertionError
```

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a flaky test in Core Lightning's test suite. A test about gossip protocol messages sometimes failed because another node would send an unexpected extra message type during the test. The fix adds that message type to the list of messages the test should ignore, making the test more reliable. There is no security issue in the actual Lightning node software.

Recommended action

No security action needed. This is a test-only reliability fix.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.