AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Bitcoin

ci: bind docker/pypi workflow inputs via env before shell

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by SashaMIT

85/100 · Strong
ci: bind docker/pypi workflow inputs via env before shell

Pass platforms-to-build, docker hub owner/version/push-latest, and
dist-location through env: before run: scripts (script-injection class).

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Changelog-None
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit hardens three GitHub Actions workflow files by moving user-controlled inputs into environment variables before they are used in shell scripts. Previously, values like platform lists, Docker Hub owner names, and PyPI distribution locations were inserted directly into shell commands. If someone with workflow trigger access supplied specially crafted input, they could potentially inject shell commands. The change follows GitHub's recommended practice of binding inputs to environment variables first, which reduces that risk.

Recommended action

Review and merge as a security hardening improvement. Ensure all other workflows in the repository follow the same pattern of binding inputs to env variables before shell use. Consider whether inputs.version and github.ref_type in pypi-publish.yml still need similar env binding for consistency.

Security signals we found

01

GitHub Actions script-injection hardening

02

Workflow inputs moved from inline expression interpolation to env variables

03

Defensive CI/CD security fix

04

No changelog entry (Changelog-None)

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 8/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.