AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

build: suppress amount checking in fuzzing tests.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Rusty Russell

90/100 · Strong
build: suppress amount checking in fuzzing tests.

```
tests/fuzz/fuzz-funder-policy.c:32: amt.satoshis %= (MAX_SATS + 1);
tests/fuzz/fuzz-funder-policy.c:132: total.satoshis, tcase->max_channel_size.satoshis);
tests/fuzz/fuzz-funder-policy.c:140: our_funds.satoshis, tcase->policy.per_channel_min.satoshis);
tests/fuzz/fuzz-funder-policy.c:145: our_funds.satoshis, tcase->policy.per_channel_max.satoshis);
tests/fuzz/fuzz-funder-policy.c:155: our_funds.satoshis, tcase->available_funds.satoshis,
tests/fuzz/fuzz-funder-policy.c:156: tcase->policy.reserve_tank.satoshis);
tests/fuzz/fuzz-funder-policy.c:161: tcase->policy.reserve_tank.satoshis, tcase->available_funds.satoshis,
tests/fuzz/fuzz-funder-policy.c:162: our_funds.satoshis);
make: *** [Makefile:577: check-amount-access] Error 1
```

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change only adds comments to a fuzz-testing file so that an internal build check no longer flags direct access to Bitcoin amount fields. It does not change any executable code or fix a security bug in the live Lightning node software.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal build/test hygiene commit.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.