AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

Makefile: make testpack.tar.gz from (almost) all changed files.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Rusty Russell

73/100 · Adequate
Makefile: make testpack.tar.gz from (almost) all changed files.

Here are the speeds and sizes of different compressors (just
compressing the raw tar file):

bzip2: 34.15s 412MB

gzip -1: 9.96s 420MB
gzip -2: 10.39s 417MB
gzip -3: 11.63s 414MB
gzip -4: 12.29s 409MB
gzip -5: 14.41s 406MB
gzip -6: 19.02s 405MB
gzip -7: 22.96s 405MB
gzip -8: 39.63s 404MB
gzip -9: 72.19s 404MB

xz: 72.92s 407MB

Uncompressing time:

xz: 2.3 seconds
bzip2: 20 seconds
gzip -5: 3 seconds

Note that this target is only useful on a *freshly built* tree: it
will include everything config.vars and newer.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how the project packages built files for testing in continuous integration (CI). It switches from a hand-maintained list of files bundled into a bzip2 archive to a rule that automatically collects almost all files newer than a build marker and compresses them with gzip. There is no user-facing behavior change, no network code, no cryptography, and no security-sensitive logic. It is purely a build/CI tooling change.

Recommended action

No security action required. Review as a normal build-system change if desired.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.