AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 26 Bitcoin

lsp_plugin: remove anchor-type from jit channel

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Peter Neuroth

68/100 · Adequate
lsp_plugin: remove anchor-type from jit channel

We use non-anchor channels for now and make this configurable in the
future. The reason for this decission is that elements does not support
anchors.

Signed-off-by: Peter Neuroth <pet.v.ne@gmail.com>
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes a single number in the code that creates 'just-in-time' (JIT) channels for Lightning Service Providers (LSPs). The old number enabled 'anchor' channels, which are a newer channel type. The new number disables anchors and falls back to a more basic channel type. The stated reason is that the Elements sidechain does not support anchor channels yet. This is a compatibility/configurability change, not a fix for an active security flaw.

Recommended action

Treat as a normal compatibility/configurability patch. Review whether hard-coding a non-anchor channel type is acceptable for all deployments, and verify that the fallback channel type is supported by counterparties. No urgent security action is indicated by the diff or commit message.

Security signals we found

01

Feature-bit change in channel negotiation

02

Removes anchor channel type from JIT channel opens

03

Stated rationale is cross-chain compatibility (Elements lacks anchor support)

04

No bounds checks, cryptographic, or memory-safety changes

Risk score

Why this scored 26/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.