cln-grpc-plugin: bump version to v0.6.0
What changed, and why it matters
This commit is a routine version bump for the cln-grpc-plugin from 0.5.0 to 0.6.0, plus a minor whitespace fix in a dependency line. It only changes two metadata files (Cargo.lock and Cargo.toml) and contains no functional code changes. There is no security relevance visible in the commit.
No security action needed. Treat as normal maintenance/versioning commit.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff updates the package version of cln-grpc-plugin from 0.5.0 to 0.6.0 in Cargo.lock and plugins/grpc-plugin/Cargo.toml, and adds a single space before the closing brace in one dependency declaration. No source code, logic, dependencies, or features were altered beyond the version string and formatting.
Changed components
plugins/grpc-plugin/Cargo.tomlCargo.lockInspect captured patch +3 / −3
diff --git a/Cargo.lock b/Cargo.lock
index c21e7593..8822b0ca 100644
--- a/Cargo.lock
+++ b/Cargo.lock
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ dependencies = [
[[package]]
name = "cln-grpc-plugin"
-version = "0.5.0"
+version = "0.6.0"
dependencies = [
"anyhow",
"cln-grpc",
diff --git a/plugins/grpc-plugin/Cargo.toml b/plugins/grpc-plugin/Cargo.toml
index fa955ad9..450c87b4 100644
--- a/plugins/grpc-plugin/Cargo.toml
+++ b/plugins/grpc-plugin/Cargo.toml
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
[package]
edition = "2021"
name = "cln-grpc-plugin"
-version = "0.5.0"
+version = "0.6.0"
description = "A Core Lightning plugin that re-exposes the JSON-RPC over grpc. Authentication is done via mTLS."
license = "MIT"
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ anyhow = "1.0"
log = "0.4"
rcgen = { version = "0.13.1", features = ["pem", "x509-parser"] }
prost = "0.12"
-cln-grpc = { workspace = true, features = ["server"]}
+cln-grpc = { workspace = true, features = ["server"] }
cln-plugin = { workspace = true }
cln-rpc = { workspace = true }
serde_json = "1.0.113"
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.