AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

pytest: fix test_xpay flake.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Rusty Russell

58/100 · Thin
pytest: fix test_xpay flake.

```
> assert len(layers['layers']) == 1
E AssertionError: assert 2 == 1
E + where 2 = len([{'layer': 'xpay', 'persistent': True, 'disabled_nodes': [], 'created_channels': [], 'channel_updates': [], 'constraints': [{'short_channel_id_dir': '45210x2134x44171/0', 'timestamp': 1770341134, 'minimum_msat': 289153519}, {'short_channel_id_dir': '1895x7x1895/1', 'timestamp': 1770341134, 'minimum_msat': 289007015}, {'short_channel_id_dir': '1906x1039x1906/1', 'timestamp': 1770341134, 'minimum_msat': 289008304}, {'short_channel_id_dir': '10070x60x10063/1', 'timestamp': 1770341134, 'minimum_msat': 289005726}, {'short_channel_id_dir': '18772x60x18743/0', 'timestamp': 1770341134, 'minimum_msat': 289005726}, {'short_channel_id_dir': '18623x208x18594/0', 'timestamp': 1770341134, 'minimum_msat': 289004859}, {'short_channel_id_dir': '33935x826x33727/1', 'timestamp': 1770341134, 'maximum_msat': 491501488}], 'biases': [], 'node_biases': []}, {'layer': 'xpay-94', 'persistent': False, 'disabled_nodes': [], 'created_channels': [], 'channel_updates': [], 'constraints': [], 'biases': [], 'node_biases': []}])
```

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a flaky test in the project's automated test suite. The test sometimes failed because it checked for leftover temporary layers too early, before they had been cleaned up. The fix simply waits for cleanup to finish before checking. There is no security issue here.

Recommended action

No security action needed. This is a routine test-flake fix.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.