AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

BOLT quotes: split cross-section quotes; prepare for new `...` semantics.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Rusty Russell

83/100 · Strong
BOLT quotes: split cross-section quotes; prepare for new `...` semantics.

The new check_quotes.py tool will treat `...` at the start of a quote as
"immediately follows previous quote in BOLT text". To prepare for that,
we change existing quotes which used leading `...` to mean "skip some
text": split them into two consecutive BOLT comments (the second starting
with `...` to use the existing wildcard match), and add explicit `*...`
markers between consecutive BOLT test vector sections which cross `# From`
headers.

Also remove leading `...` from nonce quotes in cryptomsg.c/handshake.c
where the actual BOLT text starts a fresh sentence (no prior quote in file).

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
sCo-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a documentation and code-comment cleanup. It splits BOLT (Bitcoin Lightning specification) quote comments so a new internal tool can check them more accurately, and removes a few stray leading ellipses from comments. There is no change to actual program logic, network behavior, or security-sensitive code.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal maintenance/documentation commit.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.