AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 32 Bitcoin

feat: add separate CanSendStoreEmail permission for store email API (#7345)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Abhijay Jain

85/100 · Strong
feat: add separate CanSendStoreEmail permission for store email API (#7345)

Signed-off-by: Abhijay Jain <Abhijay007j@gmail.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit introduces a new, more narrowly-scoped permission called 'CanSendStoreEmail' and applies it to the store email-sending API. Previously, sending store emails required the broader 'CanModifyStoreSettings' permission, which also allows changing many other store settings. This change follows the security principle of least privilege: it lets administrators grant API keys or users the ability to send emails without giving them full power to change store configuration. It is a hardening improvement rather than a fix for an active exploit.

Recommended action

No urgent action is required. Operators may review API keys and user roles to determine whether any previously had `CanModifyStoreSettings` only for email-sending purposes and can now be restricted to `CanSendStoreEmail`. Developers should ensure that UI/API documentation is updated to list the new permission and that existing integration tests cover both allowed and denied access cases.

Security signals we found

01

Principle of least privilege: separates email-sending capability from full store settings modification

02

Authorization policy change on a sensitive API endpoint (store email sending)

03

New permission registered with both unscoped and scoped display labels

04

Backward compatibility maintained by nesting new permission under broader store-modification policy

Risk score

Why this scored 32/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.