AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 16 Bitcoin

fix: standardize paging in WalletTransactions to use ParseListQuery (#7339)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Abhijay Jain

85/100 · Strong
fix: standardize paging in WalletTransactions to use ParseListQuery (#7339)

Signed-off-by: Abhijay Jain <Abhijay007j@gmail.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how the wallet transactions page reads its paging settings (skip/count). Instead of taking them directly from the URL, it routes them through a shared helper called ParseListQuery that also reads and saves user preferences in a cookie. The change is a code-quality fix to make paging behave consistently with other pages. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this fixes an active security vulnerability, but it removes a place where paging parameters were handled differently from the rest of the application.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine refactoring/bug-fix commit. Review whether ParseListQuery enforces acceptable max page sizes and sanitizes paging values consistently; if not, harden that shared helper. No urgent action required based solely on this diff.

Security signals we found

01

Parameter binding change for paging controls

02

Standardization onto shared preference/cookie helper

03

No input validation or authorization changes visible in diff

04

No explicit security framing in commit title or message

Risk score

Why this scored 16/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.