AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

consensus/doc: explain `GetValueOut()` precondition

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Lőrinc

73/100 · Adequate
consensus/doc: explain `GetValueOut()` precondition

`Consensus::CheckTxInputs` calls `tx.GetValueOut()` and assumes output-range checks already ran.
Document the mempool and block validation call paths where this is guaranteed.

Co-authored-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds a code comment explaining why a particular function call is safe. It does not change any program logic, fix a bug, or alter validation behavior. There is no security issue here.

Recommended action

No action required. This is a documentation-only change.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.