Public authorship map

Developer activity

Confidence-labeled identities across monitored security-critical projects. CommitWatch maps public commit evidence—not personal reputation.

Indexed contributors

Follow the work across repositories

Identity confidence matters.Verified GitHub IDs and exact account signals are distinct from candidate name-only matches. Email addresses are never displayed.Challenge a mapping →
F
Strong match

Forostovec

6 commits1 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 34/100
JB
Strong match

John Boyd

6 commits1 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 88/100
B
Strong match

Benalleng

5 commits1 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 59/100
JC
Strong match

Jamie C. Driver

5 commits1 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 53/100
TM
Strong match

Tomas Martykan

5 commits1 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 64/100
T
Strong match

Thomas

4 commits1 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 73/100
E
Strong match

ekzyis

3 commits2 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 57/100
C
Strong match

Cameric

2 commits1 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 60/100
K
Strong match

kdmukai

2 commits2 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 25/100
R
Strong match

roderico

2 commits1 monitored2 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 45/100
PN
Strong match

Peter Neuroth

97 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 70/100
PE
Strong match

Pol Espinasa

35 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 64/100
S
Strong match

stickies-v

34 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 68/100
GT
Strong match

George Tsagkarelis

32 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 66/100
RZ
Strong match

Roman Zeyde

32 commits3 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 50/100
G
Strong match

glozow

25 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 55/100
GS
Strong match

Greg Sanders

24 commits2 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 68/100
GV
Strong match

Gijs van Dam

23 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 69/100
MW
Strong match

Matt Whitlock

21 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 74/100
I
Strong match

ismaelsadeeq

19 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 69/100
G
17 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 46/100
M
Strong match

Murch

17 commits1 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 75/100
NB
Strong match

Nishant Bansal

15 commits4 monitored1 candidates0 high risk
Message clarity 72/100