AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 35 Bitcoin

refactor(core/embed): remember optiga auto states

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Ondřej Vejpustek

57/100 · Thin
refactor(core/embed): remember optiga auto states

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change refactors how the Trezor hardware wallet tracks and clears temporary 'auto-state' sessions with the Optiga secure chip. Previously, the code manually cleared specific auto-states one by one. Now it keeps a list of all active auto-states and clears them all at once. The main security-relevant improvement is that the list is updated before sending the command to the chip, so if a communication error happens while receiving the response, the state is still recorded and can be cleaned up later. This reduces the risk of leaking or exhausting limited secure-chip session slots.

Recommended action

Review the new `auto_states` array for thread-safety and concurrency assumptions, verify that `AUTO_STATES_MAX_COUNT` of 5 matches the Optiga hardware limit, and ensure that `optiga_clear_all_auto_states()` is called on all error paths that may leave auto-states registered. Consider adding a changelog entry because this change touches security-relevant secure-element state management.

Security signals we found

01

Refactor of secure-element session lifecycle management

02

Defensive change to avoid exhausting limited secure-chip auto-state slots

03

Addition of new error return path when auto-state tracking array is full

04

Pre-registration of auto-state before command execution to handle response-receipt failures

05

No changelog entry despite touching security-critical Optiga code

Risk score

Why this scored 35/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.