docs(core): fix recovery-related comment
What the developer wrote
Authored by Roman Zeyde
docs(core): fix recovery-related comment
[no changelog]
What changed, and why it matters
This commit changes only a single word inside a code comment, correcting the name of a function referenced in the comment text. No executable code, logic, or behavior was modified.
No action needed; the change is cosmetic and has no security relevance.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff is a documentation-only edit in core/src/apps/management/recovery_device/homescreen.py. It updates an inline comment from ‘_request_word_count earlier’ to ‘request_word_count earlier’ to match the actual function name. There are no code, control-flow, or data changes.
Changed components
core/src/apps/management/recovery_device/homescreen.py (comment only)Inspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/core/src/apps/management/recovery_device/homescreen.py b/core/src/apps/management/recovery_device/homescreen.py
index 763a62f3..28856ebb 100644
--- a/core/src/apps/management/recovery_device/homescreen.py
+++ b/core/src/apps/management/recovery_device/homescreen.py
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ async def _continue_recovery_process() -> Success:
try:
secret, backup_type = await _process_words(words)
# If _process_words succeeded, we now have both backup_type (from
- # its result) and word_count (from _request_word_count earlier), which means
+ # its result) and word_count (from request_word_count earlier), which means
# that the first step is complete.
is_first_step = False
except MnemonicError:
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.