AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 64 Bitcoin

fix(core): fix dma2d syscall verifiers

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by tychovrahe

57/100 · Thin
fix(core): fix dma2d syscall verifiers

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a potential integer overflow bug in the Trezor hardware wallet's kernel syscall verifier. The verifier checks whether a graphics operation's source or destination memory region is accessible before allowing it. Previously, the multiplication of stride (row byte length) by height (number of rows) was done using the original integer types, which could overflow and produce a smaller value than the actual memory region size. That could let a malicious or buggy userspace app pass the access check while reading or writing memory outside its allowed area. The fix forces the multiplication to use size_t, a wider type, so the calculated region size is accurate on 32-bit STM32 hardware.

Recommended action

Treat this as a security-relevant kernel hardening fix. Review related syscall verifiers for similar integer-width issues, ensure probe_*_access helpers correctly handle size_t inputs, and consider whether other graphics or DMA syscalls perform size arithmetic without widening. If a security advisory is issued, note the integer-overflow bypass of access checks.

Security signals we found

01

Integer overflow in memory-size calculation at kernel syscall boundary

02

Insufficient bounds check before DMA2D/bitblt memory access

03

Potential read/write access violation bypass in userspace-to-kernel syscall verifier

04

Fix uses explicit size_t widening to prevent overflow

Risk score

Why this scored 64/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 14/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 12/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.