build: add secmon target to build-docker.sh
What the developer wrote
Authored by obrusvit
build: add secmon target to build-docker.sh
[no changelog]
What changed, and why it matters
This commit simply adds a new build target called 'secmon' to a Docker build script. It changes two lines in a help message and a default list of build targets. There is no indication this is a security fix or introduces a vulnerability.
No security action required. Treat as routine build infrastructure change.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit modifies build-docker.sh to include ‘secmon’ in the default list of core build targets. This is a build-system configuration change with no functional code modifications to firmware, bootloader, or security monitor logic. No security implications are evident from the diff.
Changed components
build-docker.shInspect captured patch +2 / −2
diff --git a/build-docker.sh b/build-docker.sh
index b95dc378e..463401a93 100755
--- a/build-docker.sh
+++ b/build-docker.sh
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ function help_and_die() {
echo " --repository path/to/repo - checkout the repository from the given path/url"
echo " --no-init - do not recreate docker environments"
echo " --models - comma-separated list of models. default: --models T1B1,T2B1,T2T1,T3T1,T3W1"
- echo " --targets - comma-separated list of targets for core build. default: --targets boardloader,bootloader,firmware"
+ echo " --targets - comma-separated list of targets for core build. default: --targets boardloader,bootloader,secmon,firmware"
echo " --nrf - build nRF bootloader and firmware (for bluetooth devices, i.e. T3W1)"
echo " --help"
echo
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ OPT_BUILD_BITCOINONLY=1
OPT_BUILD_NRF=0
INIT=1
MODELS=(T1B1 T2B1 T2T1 T3T1 T3W1)
-CORE_TARGETS=(boardloader bootloader firmware)
+CORE_TARGETS=(boardloader bootloader secmon firmware)
REPOSITORY="file:///local"
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.