AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

ci: avoid running `bot-project-automation` in other repositories

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by M1nd3r

97/100 · Strong
ci: avoid running `bot-project-automation` in other repositories

- Disabled jobs in `[Bot] add to GitHub project` workflow in other repositories than `trezor/trezor-firmware`.
- Merged job to avoid remove setup duplication.

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a routine GitHub Actions workflow hardening change. It restricts an internal automation bot so it only runs in the official Trezor firmware repository, limits it to newly opened issues and pull requests, merges two nearly identical jobs into one, and pins a third-party action to a specific version. There is no indication this fixes an active security vulnerability or affects the Trezor device firmware or user funds.

Recommended action

No security action required. This is a benign CI hygiene improvement. Reviewers may optionally verify the pinned commit hash of `actions/add-to-project` matches a trusted release.

Security signals we found

01

Workflow repository guard added to prevent execution in forks

02

Third-party action pinned from floating branch to specific commit hash

03

Event trigger narrowed to reduce unnecessary workflow runs

04

No changes to firmware, bootloader, crypto, or secret storage

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.