AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 22 Bitcoin

fix(core/caesar): allow GC previous allocations at `confirm_payment_request()`

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

99/100 · Strong
fix(core/caesar): allow GC previous allocations at `confirm_payment_request()`

Otherwise `tests/device_tests/ethereum/test_signtx.py::test_signtx_payment_req` OOMs on T2B1.

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes an out-of-memory (OOM) crash during Ethereum payment-request signing on the Trezor Safe 3 (T2B1). The fix wraps UI layout construction in a temporary async task so the device's garbage collector can reclaim memory sooner. It is a reliability/DoS-style bug rather than a theft-of-funds vulnerability.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-severity stability fix. Ensure the existing `test_signtx_payment_req` device test passes on T2B1 after the change. No urgent security response is warranted unless an attacker can craft a payment request that reliably triggers the OOM to deny service or corrupt state; if such a vector is identified, re-evaluate as a DoS issue.

Security signals we found

01

Out-of-memory (OOM) crash on a hardware wallet during transaction signing

02

Fix enables earlier garbage collection of UI allocations

03

Crash reproducible by an existing device test for Ethereum payment requests

04

No changelog entry, suggesting internal bug fix rather than security advisory

Risk score

Why this scored 22/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 4/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.