AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 35 Bitcoin

fix(solana): avoid re-confirmation in staking flows

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Jakub Janků

85/100 · Strong
fix(solana): avoid re-confirmation in staking flows

Decide whether to use the predefined flow or whether to fall back
to the generic flow before requesting any confirmation from the user.

[no changelog]

(cherry picked from commit 4d3b5a5a64ea0fcaf34934d9a61e3ee70eb06449)
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change fixes a logic bug in how Trezor handles Solana staking transactions. Previously, the device could ask the user to confirm a staking detail before it had fully verified that the transaction matched a safe, predefined pattern. The fix moves that confirmation check to after all safety checks are complete, so the device only asks for confirmation when it is confident the transaction is a known, legitimate staking flow. This prevents a potentially malicious or malformed transaction from tricking the user into confirming something risky.

Recommended action

Review the Solana predefined transaction module for other confirmation ordering issues, ensure all confirmation prompts occur only after complete transaction validation, and consider adding regression tests that verify no UI prompts are emitted for malformed or non-matching staking transactions.

Security signals we found

01

UI confirmation ordering bug in transaction validation

02

Possible user confusion or premature approval in Solana staking flows

03

Validation gate bypass risk if confirmation is requested before full matching

04

No changelog entry provided

Risk score

Why this scored 35/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 7/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.