AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 35 Bitcoin

fix(core/fido2): use a static counter when returning a bogus signature

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

67/100 · Adequate
fix(core/fido2): use a static counter when returning a bogus signature

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how the Trezor hardware wallet handles FIDO2/WebAuthn 'silent authentication' attempts. When a website asks for authentication without user confirmation (user presence=false), Trezor now returns a fake signature and a fixed counter value of 0, instead of advancing the real signature counter. Previously, the code advanced the real counter even when returning a fake signature. The change prevents the real counter from leaking or being consumed during silent authentication attempts, which is a minor privacy and state-consistency improvement.

Recommended action

No urgent action needed. Review whether any relying parties or test suites depend on the previous behavior of receiving an incremented counter during silent authentication, and consider adding a changelog entry for transparency.

Security signals we found

01

Counter state no longer advanced on bogus-signature silent-authentication path

02

Static counter (0) used for non-user-present responses

03

Explicit 'Spec deviation' comment indicating intentional behavior

04

No changelog entry, suggesting low-severity internal cleanup

Risk score

Why this scored 35/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 7/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.