AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 34 Bitcoin

fix(core): increase bonds count immediately after receiving pairing completed message

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by tychovrahe

62/100 · Adequate
fix(core): increase bonds count immediately after receiving pairing completed message

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bookkeeping bug in the Bluetooth pairing code of Trezor hardware wallets. The device now correctly increments its count of bonded peers immediately when it receives confirmation that pairing completed. Previously, the count may have been updated late or missed, which could cause the wallet to incorrectly think it had no bonded Bluetooth devices or to allow more pairings than intended. The change is small and defensive, but the exact security consequences depend on how the stale count was used elsewhere in the firmware.

Recommended action

Review all consumers of drv->peer_count and the bond-count limit logic to confirm the counter is now authoritative and cannot be manipulated through repeated pairing/unpairing sequences. Consider adding defensive checks that compare peer_count against the controller's actual bond list. Because the commit is marked [no changelog], verify whether a security advisory or changelog entry is warranted once the full impact is assessed.

Security signals we found

01

State desynchronization between BLE controller bond list and firmware peer_count

02

Missing increment on pairing-completed event

03

Potential bypass of bond-count limits if peer_count is used for access control

04

Bluetooth/BLE attack surface in hardware wallet

05

[no changelog] marker present in commit message

Risk score

Why this scored 34/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.