AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 12 Bitcoin

chore(deps): bump pillow in /tools/automatic_battery_tester

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by dependabot[bot]

93/100 · Strong
chore(deps): bump pillow in /tools/automatic_battery_tester

Bumps [pillow](https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow) from 12.1.1 to 12.2.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/blob/main/CHANGES.rst)
- [Commits](https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/compare/12.1.1...12.2.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: pillow
dependency-version: 12.2.0
dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a routine dependency update by Dependabot that upgrades the Python imaging library Pillow from version 12.1.1 to 12.2.0 inside an internal battery-testing tool. The change is a single line in a requirements file. There is no indication in the commit that this fixes a known security issue, and the tool is not part of the Trezor firmware that runs on user devices.

Recommended action

Treat as routine maintenance. If the project tracks dependency updates for compliance, record the bump. No urgent action is required unless a future Pillow advisory specifically affects 12.1.1 and this tool processes untrusted images.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency version bump in an internal tooling requirements file

02

No CVE, advisory, or security-relevant description in commit or supplied references

03

Component is not part of the shipped Trezor firmware or user-facing wallet code

Risk score

Why this scored 12/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 3/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.