AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 35 Bitcoin

fix(core): wait for nRF to boot before deciding to start advertising

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by tychovrahe

62/100 · Adequate
fix(core): wait for nRF to boot before deciding to start advertising

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a timing issue during startup of the Trezor hardware wallet's Bluetooth (BLE) subsystem. Previously, the firmware might decide whether to start broadcasting Bluetooth advertisements before the wireless chip (nRF) had finished booting. The fix adds a new check that waits up to 5 seconds for the BLE subsystem to report it is fully started before making that decision. If the subsystem is not ready, the device may skip advertising for bonded peers. This is a defensive fix that could prevent Bluetooth pairing/connectivity problems or unexpected behavior at boot, but the commit itself does not describe a security vulnerability.

Recommended action

Treat as a normal reliability/defensive fix. Review whether the 5-second timeout is sufficient for all boot conditions and whether failure to start advertising could have security implications (e.g., preventing legitimate bonded devices from connecting, or causing fallback behavior). No immediate security response is indicated by the commit alone.

Security signals we found

01

Timing/race condition in startup sequence between host MCU and nRF BLE coprocessor

02

New `is_started()` BLE state query exposed to Python layer

03

Advertising decision now gated on BLE subsystem readiness

04

5-second bounded wait loop added to startup path

05

No changelog entry and no explicit security disclosure in commit message

Risk score

Why this scored 35/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.