AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 47 Bitcoin

refactor(core/ethereum): simplify and rename `_send_request_chunk()`

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

77/100 · Adequate
refactor(core/ethereum): simplify and rename `_send_request_chunk()`

Also, check `EthereumTxAck.data_chunk` size, similar to `apps.common.chunked.get_data_chunk()`.

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit refactors how a Trezor hardware wallet asks for pieces of an Ethereum transaction's data from the host computer. It renames an internal helper and, importantly, adds a size check so the host cannot return a chunk larger than the device requested. That oversized-chunk condition could previously lead to memory corruption or unexpected behavior during transaction signing.

Recommended action

Treat this as a security-hardening fix and include it in release notes. Review whether other message types that stream chunked data from the host perform equivalent length checks, and add regression tests for oversized EthereumTxAck.data_chunk responses.

Security signals we found

01

New length validation on attacker-controlled input (host-supplied data_chunk)

02

Prevention of oversized response chunks during streaming transaction signing

03

Alignment with existing defensive check in apps.common.chunked.get_data_chunk()

04

Refactor reduces exposed surface by returning bytes instead of full message object

Risk score

Why this scored 47/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 10/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 8/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.