AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
High 72 Bitcoin

fix(core/bitcoin): Fix external input misidentification.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Andrew Kozlik

77/100 · Adequate
fix(core/bitcoin): Fix external input misidentification.

(cherry picked from commit 23bbf680071f7ede286dc3eda2f4baa7193288b2)
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This update fixes a bug in the Trezor hardware wallet's Bitcoin transaction signing. When a transaction included an external input (someone else's coin) with empty placeholder fields, the device could mistake it for an already-signed input. That would let it skip both signature verification and the warning that tells the user the input is unverified. The fix makes the device treat empty bytes the same as missing fields and rejects ownership proofs on internal or already-signed inputs.

Recommended action

Apply the patch and run the updated Bitcoin signing tests, especially `test_signtx_external.py`. Review any custom integrations that construct external inputs with empty `witness` or `script_sig` fields to ensure they rely on the corrected unverified-external behavior.

Security signals we found

01

Security-relevant bug fix in Bitcoin transaction signing

02

Change from identity comparison to truthiness to handle empty byte fields consistently

03

Addition of input sanitization rules for ownership_proof presence

04

New regression test for empty witness/script_sig external inputs

05

Changelog entry labeled as security fix

Risk score

Why this scored 72/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 22/30
Exploitability 16/25
Stealth signal 12/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.