AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

refactor(core): rename pairing_cache to pairing_names

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Martin Milata

77/100 · Adequate
refactor(core): rename pairing_cache to pairing_names

In the context of storage what we call cache does not persists across
reboots but this structure does.

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a simple rename-only code cleanup. It changes internal names like 'paired_cache' to 'paired_names' and updates comments to clarify that the data is stored in flash and survives reboots. No behavior, logic, or security properties change.

Recommended action

No security action needed; this is a non-functional refactor.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.