AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 45 Bitcoin

feat(core/embed): reset tropic and retry command when alarm mode is detected

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Ondřej Vejpustek

77/100 · Adequate
feat(core/embed): reset tropic and retry command when alarm mode is
detected
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds automatic retry logic for a secure chip (Tropic) inside some Trezor hardware wallets. When the chip reports it is in 'alarm mode' or certain communication errors occur, the device now resets the chip and retries the command up to five times. The change is framed as a reliability improvement, but it touches sensitive security operations like signing, PIN verification, and key storage. There is no direct evidence this fixes an exploitable vulnerability, but retrying destructive commands (like 'mac_and_destroy') could in theory have security side effects if not handled carefully.

Recommended action

Treat as a reliability/hardening change rather than a confirmed security fix. Reviewers should verify that retrying lt_mac_and_destroy cannot cause double-execution or state desynchronization, confirm that session restart re-establishes the same authenticated channel, and ensure retry loops cannot be induced by an attacker to bypass monotonic counters or PIN-attempt limits. No immediate user action is indicated.

Security signals we found

01

New retry wrapper around security-critical secure-element commands

02

Automatic reset and session restart on LT_L1_CHIP_ALARM_MODE

03

Retry applied to destructive/irreversible operation lt_mac_and_destroy

04

Retry applied to EdDSA signing and PIN-stretching flows

05

Cache invalidation added for change-PIN counter after update

06

No explicit security advisory, CVE, or bug bounty attribution in commit

Risk score

Why this scored 45/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 7/15
Affected reach 9/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.