AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 34 Bitcoin

fix(core/thp): disable THP ACK piggybacking as a workaround for #6506

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

93/100 · Strong
fix(core/thp): disable THP ACK piggybacking as a workaround for #6506

The underlying bug can also happen without THP ACK piggybacking but
with much lower probability (it requires >200ms THP ACK delay over USB).

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit temporarily disables a performance feature called 'THP ACK piggybacking' in Trezor firmware to reduce the chance of triggering an unrelated bug referenced as issue #6506. It is described as a workaround, not a complete fix. The underlying bug can still occur, but only if a network acknowledgment is delayed by more than 200 milliseconds. The change lowers the protocol version minor number from 1 to 0 and stops the device from enabling ACK piggybacking during the handshake. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this is a security vulnerability, and no changelog entry is added.

Recommended action

Treat this as a defensive workaround pending a proper fix for issue #6506. Monitor the referenced issue for the root-cause patch and re-enable ACK piggybacking only after #6506 is resolved and the fix is reviewed. If this firmware is being evaluated for security certification, request details on #6506 from the vendor to assess whether the underlying bug has security implications.

Security signals we found

01

Workaround for an unspecified bug (#6506) with timing-related trigger condition (>200ms ACK delay)

02

Feature rollback (protocol version minor 1 -> 0) to avoid compatibility path

03

No changelog entry added despite user-facing protocol change

04

No CVE, advisory, or researcher attribution present in commit materials

Risk score

Why this scored 34/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.