AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 46 Bitcoin

fix(core): explicitly disable external tamper trigger

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by tychovrahe

62/100 · Adequate
fix(core): explicitly disable external tamper trigger

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a new function that explicitly turns off an external physical tamper-detection input on Trezor's secure microcontroller after initialization. Previously, the tamper input may have been left enabled by default after tamper_init(), which could allow a physical attacker to trigger a tamper event (and potentially wipe secrets or reset the device) using an external signal. The fix ensures the external trigger is disabled unless later explicitly enabled.

Recommended action

Treat as a security hardening fix. Verify that tamper_external_enable() is only invoked in trusted contexts (e.g., factory testing or intentional user configuration) and that no other code paths leave TAMP2E set unexpectedly. Review whether additional tamper inputs (TAMP1, TAMP3, etc.) require similar explicit disablement.

Security signals we found

01

New tamper_external_disable() function clears TAMP_CR1_TAMP2E

02

Called immediately after tamper_init() in secure monitor boot path

03

Targets external tamper input 2 specifically

04

No changelog entry suggests low-profile hardening fix

05

Change is defensive: disables a physical security feature rather than enabling one

Risk score

Why this scored 46/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.