AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 44 Bitcoin

chore: guard against insecure PRNG in bare-metal build

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Andrew Kozlik

77/100 · Adequate
chore: guard against insecure PRNG in bare-metal build

[no changelog]

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds compile-time guards to prevent an intentionally insecure random-number generator from being accidentally included in firmware that runs directly on Trezor hardware. It does not fix an active bug, but it adds safety rails so a future build misconfiguration cannot silently ship weak randomness to real devices.

Recommended action

Treat as a hardening commit. Verify CI still builds test/simulator targets correctly and that no bare-metal or production configuration accidentally selects USE_INSECURE_PRNG. No immediate incident response is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

Compile-time guard around insecure PRNG

02

Explicit block of bare-metal / freestanding targets

03

Existing production-build guard already present

04

File named rand_insecure.c signals intentionally weak randomness

Risk score

Why this scored 44/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.