AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 16 Bitcoin

fix(solana): use template for indexed cosigners [no changelog]

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Michal Kazda

77/100 · Adequate
fix(solana): use template for indexed cosigners
[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a minor user-interface wording issue in Trezor's Solana app. Previously, the device built the cosigner label by manually combining the word 'Cosigner' with a number, which could cause problems for translations. Now it uses a proper translation template 'Cosigner {0}'. There is no direct evidence this is a security vulnerability, but inconsistent or untranslatable labels could theoretically contribute to user confusion when reviewing multisig signers.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine UI/translation fix. No urgent security action is required. If auditing, verify that the new template is correctly translated in all supported languages and that the index calculation `i + (i < signer_index)` still accurately reflects the intended cosigner numbering for off-chain Solana message signing.

Security signals we found

01

UI label construction changed from runtime string concatenation to a translation template

02

No changes to signing logic, address validation, or transaction parsing

03

No vendor disclosure of security relevance in commit message or diff

04

No CVE, advisory, or researcher attribution present in supplied materials

Risk score

Why this scored 16/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.