CommitWatch RSS
AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
High 73 Bitcoin

docs(core): changelog for 2.10.1

TZ47950dd3 View source ↗
Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

80/100 · Strong
docs(core): changelog for 2.10.1

```
tools/changelog.py generate --date "18th March 2026" core 2.10.1
```

[no changelog]

(cherry picked from commit 5981eb20e85a792830e8f8a5fc38d21db8fb46ea)
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a documentation-only changelog update for the Trezor firmware 2.10.1 release. It does not change any source code, but it lists two security fixes included in the release: one for Ethereum transaction hashing and one for multisignature (multisig) verification. Because the actual code changes are not in this commit, we cannot directly assess how severe the bugs are, but the vendor labels them as security issues affecting a hardware wallet that protects cryptocurrency funds.

Recommended action

Treat this as a release marker indicating security fixes were shipped. Review the actual pull requests or commits that implemented the Ethereum hashing and multisig verification fixes to determine severity and whether to upgrade immediately. Users should install firmware 2.10.1 once the underlying fixes are confirmed relevant to their usage.

Security signals we found

01

Vendor-classified security fixes in changelog: Ethereum transaction hashing confirmation and multisig verification bug

02

Release affects all current Trezor Core models (T2B1, T2T1, T3B1, T3T1, T3W1)

03

No source-code diff in this commit; security claims are metadata only

Risk score

Why this scored 73/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 25/30
Exploitability 15/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 15/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.

More from Trezor firmware

Related watches

Low 27 AI analysisMessage 93 · Strong
TZ TrezorTrezor firmware BitcoinHardware wallets

refactor(core): digest EIP-1559/EIP-7702 magic without RLP encoding

This commit is a small internal cleanup in Trezor's Ethereum signing code. It changes how two special 'magic' bytes (the transaction type markers for newer Ethereum transaction formats) are fed into the cryptographic hash. Previously the c…

Refactor of cryptographic hashing path for Ethereum transaction signingRemoval of implicit assumption that RLP encodes small integers as single bytesChange affects EIP-1559 and EIP-7702 transaction type markers
2362bc6fby Roman Zeyde+6−32 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 98 · Strong
TZ TrezorTrezor firmware BitcoinHardware wallets

test(core): test RLP self-encoding bytestrings

This commit only adds a new unit test to the Trezor firmware codebase. It verifies that very short Ethereum RLP-encoded byte strings and small positive integers encode to themselves, which is a known property of the RLP specification. No p…

41538733by Roman Zeyde+16−01 file
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Informational 18 AI analysisMessage 57 · Thin
TZ TrezorTrezor firmware BitcoinHardware wallets

chore(core): remove sha1 from regular FW

This commit removes the SHA-1 hashing function from the regular Trezor firmware. SHA-1 is an old, weak hash algorithm that is no longer considered secure for sensitive uses. The change deletes the code that exposes SHA-1 to apps running on…

Removal of a deprecated cryptographic primitive (SHA-1) from the firmware API surfaceReduction of attack surface and prevention of future misuse of a collision-vulnerable hashNo direct vulnerability patch or memory-safety bug is present in the diff
16d15774by M1nd3r+0−2006 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗