AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 21 Bitcoin

feat(common): allow `WebAuthnListResidentCredentials` pagination

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

62/100 · Adequate
feat(common): allow `WebAuthnListResidentCredentials` pagination

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only changes the protocol definitions (the message formats) used for listing WebAuthn resident credentials. It adds an optional batch size, a flag indicating whether more credentials are available, and a new acknowledgment message so the host can request the next batch. There is no actual implementation of the pagination logic in the firmware or host code in this commit, and nothing in the commit suggests a security vulnerability. It appears to be a normal feature addition to support paginated credential listing.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal feature/schema commit. If reviewing the broader pagination feature, inspect the follow-up implementation commits for correct bounds handling on batch_size and proper state management for the pagination session.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant keywords in commit title or message

02

Schema-only change with no behavioral implementation

03

New optional field with safe default (is_done defaults to true, preserving prior behavior)

04

No validation, parsing, or memory-management code modified

05

No vendor disclosure or advisory references present

Risk score

Why this scored 21/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.