AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 26 Bitcoin

fix(emulator): handle systask_push_call() error

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by cepetr

57/100 · Thin
fix(emulator): handle systask_push_call() error

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a small but real bug in the Trezor emulator (the desktop/Unix version used for testing, not the real hardware wallet). When the emulator tries to shut down a MicroPython task, it previously ignored whether the internal 'push call' operation succeeded. If that operation failed, the code would still try to switch to the task, potentially leaving the emulator in an inconsistent or hung state. The fix adds an explicit error shutdown if the push fails. It is a hardening fix rather than a clear exploitable vulnerability, and it only affects the Unix emulator build.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-severity hardening fix. Apply the patch in normal development; no urgent security response is warranted based on the diff alone. If auditing, review systask_push_call() callers across the codebase for similar unchecked return values, especially in hardware builds where consequences could be more serious.

Security signals we found

01

Unchecked return value of internal task-management API

02

Possible inconsistent task state / emulator hang on failure path

03

Fix is in emulator-only code (core/embed/projects/unix)

04

No explicit security claim in commit message or diff

Risk score

Why this scored 26/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 6/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.