AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 59 Bitcoin

feat(core): Update RFAL library to version 4.0.2

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by kopecdav

57/100 · Thin
feat(core): Update RFAL library to version 4.0.2

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates the third-party STMicroelectronics RFAL NFC library inside Trezor firmware from version 3.0.1 to 4.0.2. The vendor's release notes for version 4.0.2 explicitly mention fixing a 'vulnerability during EMD handling on fast systems' that was introduced in version 4.0.0. EMD (Electro-Magnetic Disturbance) handling is part of the NFC radio stack, so the flaw is likely a low-level radio/communication issue rather than something that directly exposes cryptocurrency private keys. Because the commit is a large library drop (almost 8,000 lines changed across 55 files) and the actual code diff is not shown, we cannot independently verify the exact nature or severity of the vulnerability from this commit alone.

Recommended action

Treat this as a routine but security-relevant dependency update. Review the RFAL v4.0.2 upstream release notes and, if available, the upstream commit or diff for the EMD-handling fix. Run NFC regression and fuzz/EMD tests before shipping firmware that includes this update. Consider adding a changelog entry because the upstream release explicitly calls the fix a vulnerability.

Security signals we found

01

Vendor release notes label v4.0.2 change as 'Fixed vulnerability during EMD handling on fast systems'

02

Large third-party library version bump (3.0.1 -> 4.0.2) with many source files changed

03

No independent diff of the vulnerability fix is supplied in the commit excerpt

04

No CVE, advisory, or changelog entry in the commit message

Risk score

Why this scored 59/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.