AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 23 Bitcoin

fix(core): make rotation_index optional

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Martin Pastyřík

80/100 · Strong
fix(core): make rotation_index optional

fix compatibility issue by making the new rotation_index field in Evolu's EvoluRegistrationRequest optional

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit loosens a data-format rule for a Trezor feature called Evolu. It changes the `rotation_index` field in an 'EvoluRegistrationRequest' message from 'must be provided' to 'may be omitted'. The stated reason is to fix a compatibility issue so older or differently configured callers can still use the feature. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this fixes an exploitable vulnerability; it appears to be a backward-compatibility fix.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine compatibility patch. Review the Evolu registration handler to confirm it behaves safely when `rotation_index` is absent (e.g., uses a sensible default or rejects the request at the application layer if the value is actually needed). No urgent security action is indicated by the commit alone.

Security signals we found

01

Relaxation of a required field to optional in a registration protocol message

02

Removal of a presence check in generated Rust message validation

03

No mention of security impact, CVE, or vulnerability in commit message or diff

04

No changelog entry recorded ([no changelog])

Risk score

Why this scored 23/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 3/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 4/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.