AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 57 Bitcoin

fix(core/embed): fix variable name

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Ondřej Vejpustek

57/100 · Thin
fix(core/embed): fix variable name

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a typo in the code that manages the Optiga secure chip's metadata. The code was writing a value to the wrong variable name (`metadata_locked` instead of `metadata`). Because the intended `metadata` structure was not fully initialized, the device might have compared stored secure-chip settings against an incomplete or incorrect expected value. In the worst case this could affect whether the device correctly detects that the Optiga chip is configured, which is part of the hardware-security boundary protecting secrets. The change is a one-line variable-name correction and is marked [no changelog], so the vendor does not describe it as a security fix.

Recommended action

Review the full context of `optiga_is_configured()` and its callers to confirm whether the uninitialized/mismatched `metadata.lcso` could lead to incorrect secure-element state decisions. If this code path is reachable during device boot or factory setup, consider whether a security advisory or additional hardening (e.g., static analysis for unused-variable warnings) is warranted. Users on production firmware should ensure they are on a version containing this fix.

Security signals we found

01

Incorrect variable used in security-critical metadata initialization

02

Lifecycle state (LCSO) assignment target mismatch in production build

03

Secure-element configuration check depends on the corrected value

04

No changelog entry provided by vendor

Risk score

Why this scored 57/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.