AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 30 Monero

fix node backup restores

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Julian

28/100 · Opaque
fix node backup restores
✓ Subject identifies a change! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes how Stack Wallet restores saved cryptocurrency node settings from backups. Previously, the restore code assumed fields like SSL, Tor, and primary-node flags were stored in specific formats (sometimes text, sometimes true/false) and could misread or drop values, potentially restoring a node with the wrong security/privacy settings. The patch introduces a single, tested helper that consistently interprets those fields across old and new backup formats, and also preserves a previously-missing 'node API secret' field during restore.

Recommended action

Review and merge after confirming the new unit tests pass. Consider auditing other backup/restore deserialization paths for similar bool-as-string handling issues, and validate that legacy backup files with mixed field formats restore expected node security settings.

Security signals we found

01

Backup restore logic previously mixed string and bool field representations, risking misinterpretation of security-relevant flags (SSL/Tor/primary/trusted).

02

Inline casts such as `nodeData['isFailover'] as bool` could throw or default incorrectly if backup data contained stringified booleans.

03

The new factory normalizes bool/string parsing and adds fallbacks, reducing the chance that privacy/security node settings are silently changed during restore.

04

Previously missing `nodeApiSecret` is now preserved/restored, which could affect RPC authentication state after restore.

05

No explicit security claim, CVE, or researcher attribution is present in the commit or supplied references.

Risk score

Why this scored 30/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.