AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 45 Monero

Reject invalid Spark Name characters

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Reuben Yap

45/100 · Thin
Reject invalid Spark Name characters
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates the Stack Wallet app to use a newer version of the underlying Spark library and changes how 'Spark Name' registration fees are calculated. The title says it rejects invalid Spark Name characters, but the actual code diff mainly removes a manual size adjustment for the special name-tag output and updates a dependency. The security relevance is not clearly spelled out in the commit itself, and the change appears to be a partial fix or cleanup rather than a complete, self-contained security patch.

Recommended action

Review the full diff of the updated `flutter_libsparkmobile` dependency at ref `53db5a06a7b7f3df68fe6263f1453f77513bec06` to confirm what changed, especially any Spark Name character validation. Verify that removing `sparkNameFeeScriptSizeDelta` does not cause fee underestimation or transaction malleability. Add or update tests to cover invalid-character rejection and fee-calculation edge cases.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency update to an external Spark library with an unspecified change set

02

Removal of manual script-size delta calculation for Spark Name fee outputs

03

Test updated to check output structure instead of size delta

04

Commit title implies input validation for Spark Name characters, but no such validation appears in the visible diff

Risk score

Why this scored 45/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 10/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.