AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 17 Monero

fix(search): respect locale and coin precision

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Julian

57/100 · Thin
fix(search): respect locale and coin precision
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes how the wallet's search and filter features interpret typed-in amounts. Previously, the app assumed everyone uses a dot (.) as the decimal separator and parsed amounts in a way that could misread or silently mishandle values for some currencies. Now it respects the user's locale (e.g., comma for German) and uses the coin's own precision rules. There is no direct evidence this was a security vulnerability, but incorrect amount parsing in a wallet can lead to users selecting wrong coins or filters, so it is treated as a correctness/reliability fix rather than an exploit.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine bug-fix / hardening commit. Review the Amount.tryParseEditableAmount implementation to confirm it handles edge cases (leading/trailing separators, group separators, overflow) and ensure the new unit tests cover all supported locales and coin precisions. No emergency response is warranted.

Security signals we found

01

Locale-aware numeric parsing prevents decimal-separator confusion

02

Coin-specific fractionDigits now enforced consistently during search/filter parsing

03

Malformed amount inputs are rejected instead of silently parsed

04

No new dependencies or network/crypto changes introduced

Risk score

Why this scored 17/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.