AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 10 Monero

Bump flutter_libmwc to v0.1.2 (iOS shasum fix)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Dan Miller

45/100 · Thin
Bump flutter_libmwc to v0.1.2 (iOS shasum fix)
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates a single cryptocurrency plugin dependency (flutter_libmwc) to version 0.1.2, with the stated reason being an iOS checksum ('shasum') fix. The actual code changes are not visible because the diff was not provided. A checksum fix normally means a downloaded file's hash was corrected so the build can verify it was not corrupted or tampered with during download. It is a build-integrity issue, not a live vulnerability in the wallet itself, unless the wrong checksum was hiding a malicious replacement. There is no evidence in the supplied materials of malicious intent or a security breach.

Recommended action

Review the upstream flutter_libmwc v0.1.2 release notes and diff to confirm the checksum change corresponds to a legitimate, benign artifact update. Verify the new SHA256/SHA512 hashes against the published iOS binaries before merging into release builds. If the checksum mismatch was unexplained, treat it as a supply-chain incident and investigate whether any prior builds used a mismatched artifact.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency bump for a crypto plugin

02

Mentions iOS shasum/checksum correction

03

No diff content available to assess actual change

04

No security-related language in commit title or message

Risk score

Why this scored 10/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 3/10
Evidence quality 1/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.