AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 32 Monero

Add CypherGoat exchange integration

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by 4rkal

35/100 · Opaque
Add CypherGoat exchange integration
✓ Descriptive subject! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a new cryptocurrency exchange integration called CypherGoat to the Stack Wallet app. It lets users compare rates and create swaps through the CypherGoat service. The change is a normal feature addition, but it does introduce a new external API dependency and sends user-provided wallet addresses and trade details to api.cyphergoat.com. There is no direct evidence of a security vulnerability in the code itself, but any new third-party integration carries standard risks: the server could be compromised, the connection could be intercepted if certificate pinning is absent, or the API could return malicious data that the app might not fully validate.

Recommended action

Treat this as a routine feature commit, but perform a security-focused review of the new integration before release: verify TLS/certificate handling, confirm the HTTP client enforces HTTPS and validates server certificates, review JSON parsing for type confusion or missing fields, ensure user addresses and amounts are not logged, and assess CypherGoat's server security and data-handling practices. Consider adding response schema validation and pinning if not already present elsewhere in the project.

Security signals we found

01

New third-party API integration added (api.cyphergoat.com)

02

User wallet addresses and trade amounts transmitted to external service

03

Optional Tor proxy support present but not mandatory

04

No certificate pinning visible in the supplied diff

05

JSON response parsing relies on null-aware casts and default values

06

Static coin list embedded in source code may become stale

07

API key and affiliate constants added to build template

Risk score

Why this scored 32/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 8/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.