AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 23 Monero

fix(shopinbit): open the real car ticket after the research fee, not the receipt

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by sneurlax

62/100 · Adequate
fix(shopinbit): open the real car ticket after the research fee, not the receipt
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bug in the Stack Wallet app's ShopInBit car-research payment flow. Previously, after a customer paid the research fee, the app tried to open the wrong ticket (a partner-only fee receipt that the customer cannot view), which could leave the user stuck or confused. The fix adds logic to find and open the actual customer-facing car-research ticket instead, with retries and a clearer message if it isn't ready yet.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine functional/UX bug fix rather than a security patch. Review the authorization model to confirm partner receipts are never returned to customer keys, and consider server-side enforcement so clients do not need to filter inaccessible tickets. No urgent security action is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

Incorrect ticket ID used after payment could expose or reference a partner-scoped receipt not intended for customer access

02

Customer key receives 403 on fee receipt, indicating an authorization boundary between partner and customer ticket scopes

03

UI fallback now avoids navigating to a non-existent or inaccessible ticket, reducing user confusion and potential error-state leakage

04

Retry loop with bounded attempts and delay added for eventual consistency of customer-facing ticket creation

Risk score

Why this scored 23/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 4/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.